Archive for June, 2010

Jun 30 2010

LighTimes: U.S. DOE Seeks Applications for U.S. SSL Manufacturing Program

Published by admin under Editorials, General


June 29, 2010…The Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), on behalf of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energys (EEREs) Building Technologies (BT) Program, is seeking applications for the second round of applied research in the Solid-State Lighting (SSL) US Manufacturing Program. The DOE’s objective for the manufacturing program is to achieve cost reduction of solid-state lighting for general illumination through improvements in manufacturing equipment, processes, or techniques.

The DOE says it expects that success of the program will lead to a more rapid adoption/installation of high-quality SSL products resulting in a significant reduction of energy use and a corresponding reduction of environmental pollutants. A secondary objective of the project is to maintain and further establish the manufacturing and technology base within the U.S. solid state lighting such as LEDs and OLEDs. Information about round 2 of the DOE SSL Manufacturing program is available at: Fedconnect.net under search for funding opportunites. (Reference Number DE-FOA-0000334).

Courtesy

SSLDesign News Staff

No responses yet

Jun 30 2010

DisplayBank Plus: Touch-screen display revenues will reach $3.4 billion by 2014

Published by admin under Editorials, General

USA - According to a report from NanoMarkets (www.nanomarkets.net) revenues from touch-screen displays are expected to grow from $2.2 billion ($US) in 2010 to $3.4 billion in 2014.  The growing demand for touch-screen technologies in mobile and personal computing will create new opportunities for suppliers of conductive coatings, substrates and sensors in addition to the display firms themselves.

By 2014, NanoMarkets projects that revenues from in-pixel technologies are expected to reach almost $500 million in revenues.  NanoMarkets’ new report also identifies an interesting and possibly disruptive trend is taking hold in the touch display market.

Mainstream display makers have begun to develop their own “in-pixel” technologies as an alternative to the current industry practice in which third-party suppliers add a touch sensor subsystem on top of an LCD display and then sell to OEMs.  The net effect is that mid-size touch screen manufacturers instead of supplying companies such as LG, Samsung and Sony may wind up competing against them.

NanoMarkets’ report says that the fastest growing touch screen technologies will be traditional infrared and optical technology, both of which are based on infrared sensors and LEDs.  These technologies are used in digital signage and computer monitors, which are rapidly expanding addressable markets for touch technology.  By 2014 the market for traditional IR and optical touch technologies will be approximately $490 million in revenues.

NanoMarkets expects that transparent conductor materials sold into the touch-screen display market will reach revenues of $280 million by 2014.  However, by then only 64 percent of these revenues will be accounted for by expensive ITO-based materials as opposed to 92 percent today.

Courtesy DisplayBank Plus

No responses yet

Jun 27 2010

LighTimes: Results of DOE’s Gateway Demonstration of LED-based Parking Lot Lighting Published

June 25, 2010…The U.S. Department of Energy has issued results of its GATEWAY demonstration of LED-based Parking Lot Lighting at T.J. Maxx in Manchester, New Hampshire The project involved replacing a total of 28 [22- 400W (nominal) high-pressure sodium and 6- 400W metal halide] luminaires manufactured by Spaulding with 25 LED luminaires manufactured by BetaLED. The T.J. Maxx is the main tenant in the parking lot of the demonstration. In the GATEWAY demonstration each LED luminaire had an array of 120 LEDs. The luminaire was controlled by an integral occupancy sensor that connects to a driver varies its operation between “high” and “low” light output settings.

According to the study conducted by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, the BetaLED product achieved an estimated payback in this installation of about 3 years because of high electricity ($0.14/kWh) and maintenance costs incurred by the conventional products at this location. Using the lower national average electric rate of $0.104/kWh and more typical maintenance rates results in a payback slightly more than 5 years. The report says that much of the 58 percent energy savings supporting these payback calculations is attributable to the 47% reduction in average light levels for the “high” output setting

Courtesy

SSLDesign News Staff

No responses yet

Jun 27 2010

LighTimes: FTC Outlines New Labels for Light Bulb Packaging


June 22, 2010…The Federal Trade Commission announced that starting in mid-2011 consumers shopping for light bulbs will notice new labeling on packaging. The new labeling will be designed to help customers choose among the different types of bulbs on the market including: traditional incandescent bulbs, and newer high-efficiency compact fluorescent (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs.

The FTC says that the new front-of-package labels will emphasize lumens to be the measure of brightness, not watts. This will obviously be new to some consumers. To help consumers understand the savings potential an estimated cost of electricity per year of use will also be included in the label. A diagram with number line with the color temperature is designed to help consumers comprehend correlated color temperature. The higher the color temperature in degrees Kelvin, the cooler the light appearance. The label will also include the life expectancy in years of life based on three hours of use per night.

Courtesy

SSLDesign News Staff

No responses yet

Jun 16 2010

LEDs Magazine: Energy Star Luminaires specification requires comments

15 Jun 2010
Comments for the proposed Energy Star specifications for Luminaires are due later this month.
A webinar on the proposed Energy Star Luminaires specification was hosted last week (June 8, 2010) by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The webinar presentation materials can by downloaded from the Energy Star Luminaires website.

The first draft of the new Energy Star specifications for Luminaires was unveiled in May.

Energy Star Luminaire Categorization Scheme
Luminaire categories

Comments for the first draft are due via email no later than Monday, June 21, 2010. Comments should be submitted toluminaires@energystar.gov, with “ENERGY STAR Luminaires First Draft Comments” in the subject line.

The proposed timeline for this Energy Star specification revision process is as follows:

  • Luminaires Draft 1 release: May 7, 2010
  • Luminaires Draft 1 comment period close: COB June 21, 2010
  • Luminaires Draft 2 release: July 2010, followed by a comment period
  • Luminaires Draft 3 release: August 2010, followed by a comment period
  • Luminaires Final specification: September 2010
  • Luminaires specification effective date: June 2011

EPA said that many questions were addressed during the webinar, but anyone with additional questions can contact Alex Baker (tel. 202-343-9272).

Courtesy LEDs Magazine

No responses yet

Jun 15 2010

LighTimes: NIST Outlines Proposed Metric CQS to Replace CRI

Published by admin under Editorials, Technical Advice

June 15, 2010…The National Institute of Standards and Technology has issued a paper outlining the methodology for a proposed standard to replace the commonly used Color Rendering Index (CRI). Critics of the CRI measurement are quick to point out its limitations and the history of the measurement as a way to compare fluorescent lighting.

The NIST notes that CRI is a 40-year-old measurement that has issues when used to evaluate white LED lighting. The NIST’s technical committee TC 1-62 concluded that the CRI score does not correlate well with the visual evaluation in many cases. Some of these cases include instances of color saturation and color shift that can change the color discrimination ability and visual clarity of a given light. In such cases a high CRI may not actually mean good light quality.

Courtesy

LIGHTimes News Staff

No responses yet

Jun 09 2010

LEDs Magazine: DOE recommends new approach to LED luminaire lifetime ratings

Published by admin under Editorials, General, Technical Advice

DOE recommends new approach to LED luminaire lifetime ratings
07 Jun 2010
Recognizing that catastrophic failure of electronics in an LED luminaire is a concern, the DOE recommends a new way to account for such failures in addition to the widely used L and B specifications.
LED luminaires are extremely complex relative to legacy lighting technologies and the industry has struggled with an accurate way to rate the lifetime of such solid-state-lighting (SSL) products. The DOE has published a new recommendation for testing and reporting LED luminaire lifetime that accounts both for failure attributable to declining light output or lumen maintenance, and to catastrophic failure of the luminaire.

The new “LED Luminaire Lifetime: Recommendations for Testing and Reporting” guide recommends that luminaire makers specify an F rating for catastrophic failures – for example F10 at 30,000 hours would imply that 10% of the luminaires in a given population would fail catastrophically by 30,000 hours of usage.

DOE Lighting Program Manager Jim Brodrick mentioned the report in his weekly Postingsnewsletter writing, “Longevity is considered one of SSL’s major advantages over traditional lighting technologies, and manufacturers are quite naturally touting it as a big selling point. But the topic is extremely complicated.” Indeed both LED manufacturers and luminaire makers need a way to accurately define lifetime. Moreover, buyers need accurate information to justify SSL purchases and calculate accurate payback windows.

The new recommendation builds on the L and B ratings that originated with Philips Lumileds. First lumen maintenance was defined with a figure such as L70 at 50,000 hours implying that an SSL product would decline to 70% of its initial light output after 50,000 hours of usage – essentially reaching the end of its useful life. The B figure was added such that L70/B50 at 50,000 hours implies that 50% of a population of lights reach the L70 point in 50,000 hours.

The L and B specifications were first targeted at lumen maintenance at the LED component level. LED brightness can decline based on age, drive current, and operating temperature. Indeed, LED makers such as Philips provide L and B specifications relative to current and temperature.

Shortest of L/B and F specifications is figure of merit for lifetime rating

Luminaire makers must provide fixture level specifications based on the entire system. The L and B luminaire ratings must account for lumen maintenance and for catastrophic failure of one or more individual LEDs. Luminaire designs based on arrays of LEDs can suffer individual LED failures without falling below an L70 spec.

L and B ratings at the luminaire level have not accounted for catastrophic failures. Such failures would not likely be due to LED failure but rather to failed drive electronics, failed solder joint or other problem. A simple component such as an electrolytic capacitor can cause a catastrophic failure.

The DOE recommendation actually identifies 12 reliability considerations that could contribute to a catastrophic failure lifetime rating including electrical connections, printed circuit boards, thermal elements, the drive electronics and more. The F rating should account for all of the considerations.

The DOE further recommends that luminaire makers choose the shortest life rating between L/B and F specifications as the one used in a luminaire lifetime rating. For example, if a luminaire L70/B50 point is 50,000 hours and the F10 point is 40,000 hours then the luminaire maker should report a lifetime of 40,000 hours.

The new report was developed by a working group under the guidance of the DOE SSL Quality Advocates program. The group was formed jointly by the DOE and the Next Generation Lighting Industry Alliance. This work follows the earlier “Reporting LED Luminaire Product Performance” report that led to the Lighting Facts label.

Of course defining a way to specify lifetime still doesn’t solve the inexact science of determining actual numbers. As Brodrick noted in his newsletter, products rated for 50,000 hours can’t be actually tested in real time. And the fast-paced SSL industry will result in new components, drive electronics, and other changes long before a single product makes it through a six-year, 50,000-hour deployment. So luminaire and LED makers must extrapolate the lifetime ratings.

Courtesy LEDs Magazine

No responses yet

Jun 02 2010

LEDs Magazine: EPA will host Energy Star lighting Webinar on June 8

01 Jun 2010
Web event presented by the US Environmental Protection Agency will examine the Energy Star Luminaires V1.0 specification.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) invites all lighting partners, stakeholders, and other interested parties to participate in a June 8 webinar on Energy Star lighting, including LED-based solid-state lighting (SSL). The webinar will provide an overview of draft 1 of the ENERGY STAR Luminaires V1.0 specification.

We covered news of the draft in a recent article, along with a chronology of the changes in the Energy Star Lighting program. The EPA is looking for comments on the new spec by June 21 – the new spec will replace the existing Residential Light Fixtures (version 4.2) and Solid State Lighting Luminaires (version 1.1) specifications.

The webinar will include both a presentation and a question and answer session. Interested parties are asked to send an email to luminaires@energystar.gov with the subject line “June 8 Luminaires Webinar” and the EPA will respond with instructions for participation.

Courtesy LEDs Magazine

No responses yet

home           products           applications         services        news         resources         support & contact       library
Optronic Laboratories : Light Measurement Experts
Copyright © 2010 All Rights Reserved .
Site Admin | RSS 2.0

Optronic Laboratories, Inc. 4632 36th Street Orlando, FL  32811 Phone: 407-422-3171 Toll Free: 800-899-3171
On Target Web Solutions : Web Design & Internet Marketing